Re: Need feedback about PEAR Coding Standard related to PHP_CodeSnifferusage

From: Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 15:04:51 +0000
Subject: Re: Need feedback about PEAR Coding Standard related to PHP_CodeSnifferusage
References: 1  Groups: php.pear.qa 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-qa+get-4701@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Hi Laurent, I'd agree with Greg that @ignore should only be used to not have documentation included for the **end user**. I believe it is best to have **all** code in PEAR to be properly documented with inline phpDoc, and not use @ignore as an excuse for sloppy coding practice. -Philippe Laurent Laville wrote: > As suggested by Greg Sherwood, and because I would like to know opinion > of community, about a request I've post on PHP_CodeSniffer. > > Details of this request is available at [1] with answer of Greg. > > What are your point of view : QA / PEAR teams group first ? > > Laurent > > [1] http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=12700

« previous php.pear.qa (#4701) next »