Re: Re: Need feedback about PEAR Coding Standard related to PHP_CodeSnifferusage
| From: | Chuck Burgess | Date: | Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:31:33 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Need feedback about PEAR Coding Standard related to PHP_CodeSnifferusage | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.qa |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-qa+get-4702@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Dec 17, 2007 9:04 AM, Philippe Jausions <Philippe.Jausions@11abacus.com>
wrote:
> Hi Laurent,
>
> I'd agree with Greg that @ignore should only be used to not have
> documentation included for the **end user**.
>
> I believe it is best to have **all** code in PEAR to be properly
> documented with inline phpDoc, and not use @ignore as an excuse for sloppy
> coding practice.
>
> -Philippe
>
I agree with Greg and Philippe... I had been holding off on replying
already, since you'd asked for QA and PEAR Group opinions first :)
--
CRB
Let me introduce you to my very own DMCA-protected encryption key:
BC 1B 64 4A 8D DE 49 E8 C3 7D CC EE 1A AD EE F5
(compliments of Freedom-to-Tinker http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/?p=1155)