Re: Request to be maintainer of Spreadsheet_Excel_Writer package
| From: | Progi1984 | Date: | Mon, 03 Aug 2009 12:00:21 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Request to be maintainer of Spreadsheet_Excel_Writer package | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.qa |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-qa+get-5388@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Thank you for your discouragement which is really realistic. But like
I need it for my job, I improve it and want it to give it open source.
And I keep an eye on this package OpenDocument but I don't want
contribute while the version 0.3.0 isn't implemented.
I have contributed to Wikini, for improving the XHTML-valid support.
But my main code isn't public because it owns to my company. I use
principally these packages : HTML_QuickForm,
HTML_QuickForm_advmultiselect, HTML_Template_PHPLIB, HTTP_Session2,
MDB2, MDB2_Driver_pgsql, Mail, Net_SMTP, Spreadsheet_Excel_Writer. I
have personnally a preference over file formats.
2009/8/3 Daniel O'Connor <daniel.oconnor@gmail.com>:
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 7:54 PM, Progi1984 <progi1984@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The Spreadsheet_Excel_Writer package seems to be orphaned.
>> The last release is well over 3 years old.And there didn't seem to be
>> any SVN activity since 2 years. And the actual maintainer is inactive.
>>
>> As web developer in a French company, I use pear every day for the
>> development of Intranet. I would like to contribute to pear, and more
>> particularly Spreadsheet_Excel_Writer. Actually, i began fixing bug
>> one after another.
>
> It's actually a quite complicated package which is several versions out of
> date from the original perl version, with poor documentation (ie; the specs
> from microsoft are incomplete); so I would discourage you from looking after
> it all by yourself!
>
> If you are really interested, it might be worth looking at alternatives -
> ie, http://pear.php.net/package/opendocument is our current
> best hope.
>
> That being said, do you have a few samples of code you are particularly
> proud of?
> Or are there any packages you use at work you'd be interested in
> participating in?
>
>