Re: about a new Archive_Tar release
| From: | Christian Weiske | Date: | Sat, 28 Nov 2009 15:33:22 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: about a new Archive_Tar release | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.qa |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-qa+get-5527@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi all,
> > Now that I have some time to spend on that, I'm thinking about
> > marking the next release 'beta'. Even though I'm pretty confident
> > about my fixes, Archive_Tar is an essential package.
> It's not *customary* to mark an X.Y.Z bump as beta if it's part of an
> already stable X.Y, but I don't think there are any *guidelines*
> against it. I think you'll be fine to do so.
There is a rule:
http://pear.php.net/group/docs/20040226-vn.php
It says:
> from 1.0.0 to a new beta feature release, use 1.1.0beta1 as version
> number.
--
Regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Christian Weiske
-= Geeking around in the name of science since 1982 =-
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] signature.asc
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] signature.asc