Re: HTTP_Session2 - we can has release?
| From: | Daniel O'Connor | Date: | Sun, 21 Feb 2010 12:59:10 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: HTTP_Session2 - we can has release? | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Groups: | php.pear.qa |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-qa+get-5604@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 7:29 PM, till <klimpong@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 6:52 AM, Daniel
> O'Connor<daniel.oconnor@gmail.com> wrote:
> > tpear
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 9:06 AM, till <klimpong@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 1:35 AM, Daniel
> >> O'Connor<daniel.oconnor@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 12:08 AM, till <klimpong@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Errr... yeah. We should. I haven't looked into the Doctrine stuff.
> >> >> It's sorta blocking it and I must confess I have a strong dislike for
> >> >> CVS and no energy/time to wrestle with it.
> >> >
> >> > You mean Doctrine is blocking HTTP_Session2 in some way, or Doctrine
> is
> >> > higher up on your todo list?
> >> >
> >> > If you want, I can do the release for you :D
> >> >
> >>
> >> I have a Doctrine driver and it caused an exception and I haven't had
> >> a chance to debug it yet. Lukas sent me some code a while back and I
> >> have to inc. it. I'll take care of it.
> >
> > Any chance to take a look?
> > Does it cause regression from existing functionality or is it just a bit
> > dodgy in some cases (ie: you'd be able to explain it in release notes
> > without people shooting at you)?
> >
>
> Weekend. ;-)
>
:(
I'd knock this one off, but Doctrine isn't pear installable at the moment,
the unit test coverage is an unknown quantity.
Any chance this weekend till?