Re: HTTP_Session2 - we can has release?

The weekend is over - so no. But I'll put it on my todo for this week. :) Weird about the doctrine thing, it used to work. Till On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Daniel O'Connor <daniel.oconnor@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 7:29 PM, till <klimpong@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 6:52 AM, Daniel >> O'Connor<daniel.oconnor@gmail.com> wrote: >> > tpear >> > >> > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 9:06 AM, till <klimpong@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 1:35 AM, Daniel >> >> O'Connor<daniel.oconnor@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 12:08 AM, till <klimpong@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Errr... yeah. We should. I haven't looked into the Doctrine stuff. >> >> >> It's sorta blocking it and I must confess I have a strong dislike >> >> >> for >> >> >> CVS and no energy/time to wrestle with it. >> >> > >> >> > You mean Doctrine is blocking HTTP_Session2 in some way, or Doctrine >> >> > is >> >> > higher up on your todo list? >> >> > >> >> > If you want, I can do the release for you :D >> >> > >> >> >> >> I have a Doctrine driver and it caused an exception and I haven't had >> >> a chance to debug it yet. Lukas sent me some code a while back and I >> >> have to inc. it. I'll take care of it. >> > >> > Any chance to take a look? >> > Does it cause regression from existing functionality or is it just a bit >> > dodgy in some cases (ie: you'd be able to explain it in release notes >> > without people shooting at you)? >> > >> >> Weekend. ;-) > > :( > > I'd knock this one off, but Doctrine isn't pear installable at the moment, > the unit test coverage is an unknown quantity. > > Any chance this weekend till? >