Re: Bug #868: PEAR QA: improvement for get_class()-usage

From: Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 13:46:41 +0000
Subject: Re: Bug #868: PEAR QA: improvement for get_class()-usage
References: 1 2  Groups: php.pear.qa 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-qa+get-700@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
> Just noticed something here... there's a typo that's not too friendly ;-) > > Subject: [PEAR-QA] [PEAR-BUG] Bug #868: PEAR QA: improvement for > get_class()-usage > > > Please note that if you don't react to this issue within 4 weeks the PEAR > > QA-team will take care of it automatically. This is not "rude" but > > necessary for QA. > > If this is a "false positive" and your package is not affected please > > apologize. > > it should read: > > If this is a "false positive" and your package is not affected please > accept our apologies. > > The developer does not have to apologize for our mistake ;-) Been there told'm that. Guess the suggestion and the other typo-fixes were lost in conversation somewhere ;) Cipri

« previous php.pear.qa (#700) next »