Re: Bug #868: PEAR QA: improvement for get_class()-usage
| From: | Stefan Neufeind | Date: | Thu, 26 Feb 2004 15:03:23 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Bug #868: PEAR QA: improvement for get_class()-usage | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.qa |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-qa+get-742@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 26 Feb 2004 at 14:45, Klaus Guenther wrote:
> Just noticed something here... there's a typo that's not too friendly
> ;-)
>
> Subject: [PEAR-QA] [PEAR-BUG] Bug #868: PEAR QA: improvement for
> get_class()-usage
>
> > Please note that if you don't react to this issue within 4 weeks the
> > PEAR QA-team will take care of it automatically. This is not "rude"
> > but necessary for QA. If this is a "false positive" and your package
> > is not affected please apologize.
>
> it should read:
>
> If this is a "false positive" and your package is not affected please
> accept our apologies.
>
> The developer does not have to apologize for our mistake ;-)
However, I won't add a comment to each now ... :-)) Everybody knows
what's meant!
sn