Re: New package DataGrid

On Tue Mar 16, 2004 at 11:5508AM -0500, Andrew S. Nagy wrote: > One thing that I am thinking about as I prepare for the name change, are the > comments that Joe Stump made on the developers list. Could the name > "Structures_DataGrid" harm in the marketing of this package? As this > package (i hope) has a lot of potential for HTML developers, I would want to > market this package as much as possible. Maybe my thought process is being > skewed by my corporate thinking as I am at work right now, but I am curious > if people would be more welcoming to use a toolkit called "PEAR::DataGrid" > as aposed to "PEAR::Structures_DataGrid"? Does the "Structures_" take away > from the "branding"? I think this is a very subjective problem, and a lot of people will feel differently about it. Personally I do not attach a lot of importance to the "brand" problem, but at the same time I can understand that you are worried to decrease the buzzword factor of the package name. -- - Martin Martin Jansen http://martinjansen.com/