RE: [PEAR-QA] New package DataGrid
| From: | Andrew S. Nagy | Date: | Tue, 16 Mar 2004 18:01:38 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PEAR-QA] New package DataGrid | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.qa |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-qa+get-973@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
I don't know if I am becoming a pain, but can I reopen the naming issue for
discussion? Now that I have reflected on the issues, I am not sure what to
do.
1. I feel that the name DataGrid is a more catchy and "brandable" name more
so than Structures_DataGrid considering the datagrid is not a data structure
like a btree or a dequeue is. Structures seems to be the best category for
the DataGrid, but I am not sure if it belongs in the name.
2. I feel that there should be a naming scheme for pear packages so newbie
PEAR users can find exactly what they want/need easily, but maybe it has
some adverse effects. Maybe the the adverse effects are not as important as
a defined and structured naming scheme? Both the .NET framework as well as
CPAN do not follow a naming scheme like Structures::Structures_*
Hopefully your wisdom will point me in one direction as I am at a cross
roads now.
Thanks again for your patience
Andrew