#1319 [Asn]: PATCH fix styles for manual navigation
| From: | danielc at analysisandsolutions dot com | Date: | Sun, 02 May 2004 01:16:47 +0000 |
| Subject: | #1319 [Asn]: PATCH fix styles for manual navigation | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.webmaster |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-webmaster+get-2201@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
ID: 1319
User updated by: danielc at analysisandsolutions dot com
Reported By: danielc at analysisandsolutions dot com
Status: Assigned
Bug Type: Web Site
Operating System: Irrelevant
PHP Version: Irrelevant
Assigned To: mj
New Comment:
Just making sure. You just mean the words "(previous)" and "(next),"
and not the whole thing, right? If so, remove the <small> around them.
No need to revert the whole patch.
They look fine to me. Guess it depends on the base font size in your
browser's preferences. See why I wanted to use pt? Perhaps try pt and
see how it looks?
By the way, my resolution is 1024, browser is a recent Mozilla build,
os is Windows, base font size is 20 px.
Previous Comments:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2004-05-01 20:00:35] helgi at trance dot is
(next) (previous) is way to small ... I'm using FireFox on Linux with
1024 res. ;/
But I don't wanna touch the style.css ... Martin will probly never the
less reverte that ;D So Martin make it a little bigger :)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2004-05-01 16:55:56] mj@php.net
Commited.
I changed the absolute font sizes to relative ones and additionally I
also "cleaned up" the stylesheet a bit.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2004-05-01 16:09:40] danielc at analysisandsolutions dot com
Helgi, please provide a citation regarding "pt" in CSS being meant for
printed matter. It's not mentioned in the CSS 1 recommendation, that's
for sure.
When fixed size fonts are needed (as I believe they are in this case),
pt is the way to go because they are more consistently rendered than
px.
Martin, even though I'm arguing for pt, it's not THAT big a deal. Just
apply the patch with the existing 8pt or substituting 75% and I'll be
happy.
Thanks.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2004-04-30 23:47:06] helgi at trance dot is
Well one should never use pt on web since those are mostly only ment
for printing ;)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2004-04-30 13:17:42] danielc at analysisandsolutions dot com
In general I agree with you about absolute font sizes. The reason
they're acceptable in this situation is the text in question is just
the navigation stuff (previous/next and language links, etc) which
isn't really meant to be read.
Also, the fixed size comes in handy here because the existing style
sheets already set the body font to a relative size. If that size gets
changed at some future time, it would impact how the navigation lays
out. This already happened once recently.
If you disagree, please change "8pt" to "75%" in style-manual.css and
then apply it.
Thanks.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The remainder of the comments for this report are too long. To view
the rest of the comments, please view the bug report online at
http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=1319
--
Edit this bug report at http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=1319&edit=1