Re: Re: cvs: php4 /pear/Cache/Container db.php

On Fri, Mar 02, 2001 at 10:44:44AM -0500, Chuck Hagenbuch wrote: > I realize there will be code changes necessary to deal with changing the > timestamp field to an int (in which we'd just store a unix timestamp), but I > think it's worth it so that we avoid portability problems between various > databases that either might not have timestamp fields, call them datetime, or > implement them differently... I was under the impression that 'timestamp' was a standard SQL field type. At least, it appears to be under the SQL99 standard. Ref: http://www.comptechnews.com/~reaster/sql99-syntax.txt -- Jon Parise (jon@csh.rit.edu) . Rochester Inst. of Technology http://www.csh.rit.edu/~jon/ : Computer Science House Member