Re: require_once versus include_once

On Fri, Jul 28, 2000 at 10:20:54AM -0400, Chuck Hagenbuch wrote: > We have a problem in that require_once and include_once can include > the same file. Now, if you have an application that dynamically > includes some code - maybe it dynamically includes PEAR.php if it > needs it - and it also always uses, say, the new Socket.php from > Stig that uses PEAR.php - then you can get a collision. [snip] > Am I being clear? Does anyone else see the problem? So, if I'm following you correctly, require_once and include_once should be checking the same pool of already required / included files. -- Jon Parise (jon@csh.rit.edu) . Rochester Inst. of Technology http://www.csh.rit.edu/~jon/ : Computer Science House Member