Re: require_once versus include_once

Quoting Jon Parise <jon@csh.rit.edu>: > So, if I'm following you correctly, require_once and include_once > should be checking the same pool of already required / included files. I suggested that a while ago, but someone (Zeev, I think) said that that wouldn't happen, since it'd mix compile-time and run-time operations. It's the only clean solution I can think of, though. -chuck -- Babies have self esteem. They are born loving their toes and finding them fascinating and delicious.