Re: kick-off
| From: | Andrei Zmievski | Date: | Mon, 28 Feb 2000 22:32:14 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: kick-off | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-pear+get-20@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Mon, 28 Feb 2000, chagenbu@wso.williams.edu wrote:
> I agree that using classes is cleaner namespace-wise. The only thing that it
> sort of prevents is writing packages that are backwards compatible to php3. I
> guess that's a policy decision - do we want to really push people to upgrade to
> 4? If so, then make Pear 4-only and accumulate as many classes into it as
> possible. If not, then maybe some consideration should be made for having
> function packages as well.
>
> Also, here's a consideration: Can you pass a method name to usort() yet? If not,
> we'll have to allow at least sorting functions...
I think you can pass "Sort::qsort" or something similar to usort() and
it should work.
-Andrei
* It's an emergent property of human minds to create. *