Re: kick-off

From: Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 22:32:14 +0000
Subject: Re: kick-off
References: 1 2  Groups: php.pear 
Request: Send a blank email to php-pear+get-20@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Mon, 28 Feb 2000, chagenbu@wso.williams.edu wrote: > I agree that using classes is cleaner namespace-wise. The only thing that it > sort of prevents is writing packages that are backwards compatible to php3. I > guess that's a policy decision - do we want to really push people to upgrade to > 4? If so, then make Pear 4-only and accumulate as many classes into it as > possible. If not, then maybe some consideration should be made for having > function packages as well. > > Also, here's a consideration: Can you pass a method name to usort() yet? If not, > we'll have to allow at least sorting functions... I think you can pass "Sort::qsort" or something similar to usort() and it should work. -Andrei * It's an emergent property of human minds to create. *

« previous php.pear (#20) next »