Re: kick-off

Gday all, I reckon we stick with the Classes only, could get scary when we have a huge amount of PEAR packages if we include functions. Matta "Stig S. Bakken" wrote: > > Welcome to the PEAR mailing list! > > I'd like to start off by throwing out the first unresolved issue I can > think of: > > Should PEAR contain classes and extensions only, or functions too? By > using the Class::method() syntax, functions can be made part of a class > but still be available directly, so I lean towards using only classes. > If we do decide on having functions too, we should consider namespace > issues: should functions then have a prefix based on the name of the > package they are from (for example "db_mysql_query"), or should they > have simpler names? > > - Stig