Re: Voting for PHPDoc to get into CVS on php.net

From: Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2000 11:43:58 +0000
Subject: Re: Voting for PHPDoc to get into CVS on php.net
References: 1  Groups: php.pear 
Request: Send a blank email to php-pear+get-341@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Sun, 8 Oct 2000, Björn Schotte wrote: > Hi, > > I was attending (and organizing) the PHP congress at > Cologne, 05-Oct - 06-Oct 2000. We heard the lecture > about PHPDoc from Ulf Wendel. As I didn't know very > much about the features of his tool, I was very > impressed about those million features of PHPDoc. It > runs very well and I think it strongly _should_ become > somewhat we call a "standard" application that is > shipped with the PHP distribution. It is not only > necessary for PEAR classes, but for all PHP projects > a good software architect constructs. > > I also think that we shouldn't name it "peardoc" > in CVS - this name is somewhat confusing ("Oh, I can > only use this for PHP classes, not for my own projects"). > I vote FOR PHPdoc (peardoc in CVS), after testing a bit around. It's a great tool especially for large projects. Anyone who is interested in writing high-end applications in PHP should try it out. Jan

« previous php.pear (#341) next »