Re: PECL Submission Question
| From: | l0t3k | Date: | Thu, 29 Jul 2004 18:48:49 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PECL Submission Question | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.pecl.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pecl-dev+get-1059@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
"Wez Furlong" <kingwez@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:4e89b4260407291041131eaaaf@mail.gmail.com...
> The whole point of pecl to foster extension development; it's never
> too soon to get it visible.
great. i could really use the help...
> If you don't already have a CVS account, this is the point where I
> would ask you to sign up for one.
> Right now we have an outage with our master server, so we can't create
> a new account.
i assume that only one CVS account is needed across all PHP projects ? i
contributed some code to ext/standard eons ago (4.0B), though i cant
remember the password now. if i could, id like to use another CVS handle
anyways.
> Since you already seem to have an alternative CVS, this probably isn't
> a huge problem; if you are ready to publish a beta PECL package, you
> may still sign up for a PECL account and upload the tarball.
i take this to mean that a project hosted in PECL can have an alternate CVS
? i think the PECL repository would probably be better longterm. i'll wait
a bit on the beta until i iron out a few more issues.
thanks for the response...
l0t3k