Re: PECL Submission : Partie Deux
| From: | l0t3k | Date: | Sat, 31 Jul 2004 12:09:37 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PECL Submission : Partie Deux | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pecl.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pecl-dev+get-1064@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
"Wez Furlong" <kingwez@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:4e89b426040731020859ec678f@mail.gmail.com...
> It seems to make sense to call it "icu" to me, since that is the
> underlying library.
that could work.. the reason i've avoided 'icu' as a name thus far is that
i've almost completely rewritten the original code (C++ -> C, use of PHP
streams and mem-management etc), so i wouldnt want to confuse anyone into
thinking the two codebases were the same.
l0t3k