Re: New libfann binding

From: Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 11:04:37 +0000
Subject: Re: New libfann binding
References: 1 2 3 4 5  Groups: php.pecl.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pecl-dev+get-10866@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Johannes Schlüter <johannes@schlueters.de>wrote: > On Thu, 2013-07-18 at 10:51 +0100, Jakub Zelenka wrote: > > Is it ok to update the extension without migration path in this case? > > What I'm thinking about is calling the new one fann2 and deprecate fann. > This helps the lost souls using the old one and is a clean cut. > > johannes > Sounds good to me. I think that would be a good idea if I was a maintainer of both extensions (fann as well as fann2). I would update the old package info explaining that fann is deprecated and works only with PHP4 (btw. was the zif to zim change done in PHP 5.0?) and libfann 1. I could also resolve bugs in fann instructing users to update to fann2. Would this be ok? Jakub

« previous php.pecl.dev (#10866) next »