Re: Windows Snapshot builds
| From: | Hannes Magnusson | Date: | Tue, 10 Jun 2014 22:06:03 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Windows Snapshot builds | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pecl.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pecl-dev+get-11875@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Anatol Belski <anatol.php@belski.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, June 9, 2014 19:09, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Hannes Magnusson
>> <hannes.magnusson@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Anatol Belski <ab@php.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, June 3, 2014 19:14, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I noticed you pushed bunch of changes to the repo just which seem
>>>>> to actually have been live for a while.. Does the build host update
>>>>> from some other repo I would need to merge up to?
>>>>>
>>>> that's the github OSTC repo forked from rmtools somewhen, havent
>>>> synced for a while. As that system is a prerunner for what we gonna
>>>> have with the travis integration, it doesn't really matter. As besides
>>>> the snapshot builds running tests is also the topic, which is much
>>>> finer done with travis. Probably also a good thing to deliberate
>>>> before starting to do something.
>>>
>>>
>>> I think we just did that and have a solid plan I can work on.
>>>
>>>
>>> Since attempting to duplicate the machinery is clearly impossible task
>>> without having access to the current setup I would need to work blind
>>> folded with trial and error here and there - which is why I asked can I
>>> somehow see any logs (and to confirm, it is running the rmtools repo on
>>> git.php.net you pointed me too, right?). Alternatively, if I can get
>>> access to the infrastructure that would be best.
>>
>>
>> Any updates?
>> Feel like I am slacklining in a pitch dark cave above a lake full of
>> piranha :) If this is maintained on a vm or something I can replicate it
>> would be awesomest...
>>
> yes, that's a VM but a clone is out of a question as there are too much
> things there we can't simply "revert" to anonymize it. Btw. i really think
> travis-ci integration were interesting to keep in mind, as that would
> probably turn the whole thing upside down.
>
Can I get access to the server then while I attempt to develop these patches?
-Hannes