Re: Windows Snapshot builds

On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Anatol Belski <anatol.php@belski.net> wrote: > On Wed, June 11, 2014 00:06, Hannes Magnusson wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Anatol Belski <anatol.php@belski.net> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> On Mon, June 9, 2014 19:09, Hannes Magnusson wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Hannes Magnusson >>>> <hannes.magnusson@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Anatol Belski <ab@php.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, June 3, 2014 19:14, Hannes Magnusson wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> I noticed you pushed bunch of changes to the repo just which >>>>>>> seem to actually have been live for a while.. Does the build >>>>>>> host update from some other repo I would need to merge up to? >>>>>>> >>>>>> that's the github OSTC repo forked from rmtools somewhen, havent >>>>>> synced for a while. As that system is a prerunner for what we >>>>>> gonna have with the travis integration, it doesn't really matter. >>>>>> As besides >>>>>> the snapshot builds running tests is also the topic, which is much >>>>>> finer done with travis. Probably also a good thing to deliberate >>>>>> before starting to do something. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I think we just did that and have a solid plan I can work on. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Since attempting to duplicate the machinery is clearly impossible >>>>> task without having access to the current setup I would need to work >>>>> blind folded with trial and error here and there - which is why I >>>>> asked can I somehow see any logs (and to confirm, it is running the >>>>> rmtools repo on git.php.net you pointed me too, right?). >>>>> Alternatively, if I can get >>>>> access to the infrastructure that would be best. >>>> >>>> >>>> Any updates? >>>> Feel like I am slacklining in a pitch dark cave above a lake full of >>>> piranha :) If this is maintained on a vm or something I can replicate >>>> it would be awesomest... >>>> >>> yes, that's a VM but a clone is out of a question as there are too much >>> things there we can't simply "revert" to anonymize it. Btw. i really >>> think travis-ci integration were interesting to keep in mind, as that >>> would probably turn the whole thing upside down. >>> >> >> >> Can I get access to the server then while I attempt to develop these >> patches? >> > actually that is out of my competention, but i guess it's the same as with > the vm clone. I'm going OOF for the next three weeks, and probably offline > for some time due to the Internet provider update, so will probably be > able to continue to talk about this topic after that first. > Who else has access to it I would be able to talk to? It doesn't look like there is much of anything I can actually work on since the infrastructure itself is uncloneable and inaccessible? -Hannes