Re: [apd][patch] Two new functions: override_constant() and rename_constant()

Hi, George Schlossnagle wrote: > On Sep 13, 2004, at 2:24 AM, Derick Rethans wrote: >> Just wondering, but why the hell would you want to change *constants*? >> :) > > Same reasons you would want to overide functions, I guess. :) ;-) > Johannes: > > I haven't looked at it, but is this part of the functionality of > parsekit? I think the additions are good, but also think the > introspection/manipulation functions should be moved out of apd and > into something more specifically designed for that. If parsekit > doesn't do that, would you be interested in writing one, starting with > your code and the function-functions from apd? parsekit is about "runtime analysis of opcodes" which is imho different from "manipulation hash tables" so it is more related to classkit which is - by its name - unfortunately limited to classes. (CCed Sara to get her opinion) Maybe it's an good idea to take the constant&function manuipulation stuff into a new extension, as you said. Anyone with an idea for name, which should imho include the "kit"-part or is including this into"classkit" better? Any opinions are welcome ;-) johannes