Re: New Package Name: "request" ?
| From: | Timandes White | Date: | Wed, 26 Oct 2016 00:49:28 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: New Package Name: "request" ? | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pecl.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pecl-dev+get-14080@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Try hrrw (HTTP Request N Response Wrapper)?
:)
Or just requestwrapper?
Paul Jones <pmjones88@gmail.com>于2016年10月26日周三 上午4:59写道:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Now that my account has been approved (thanks again Alan!) I'd like to
> register the package that John Boehr and I have been working on. Per <
> http://pecl.php.net/package-new.php>:
>
> > Make sure you pick the right name for your package. This is usually done
> through "community consensus", which means posting a suggestion to the
> pecl-dev mailing list and have people agree with you.
>
> So, given the following work in progress ...
>
> <https://gitlab.com/pmjones/phprequest/> "This
> extension provides
> fundamental server-side request and response objects for PHP. These are not
> HTTP message objects proper. They are more like wrappers for existing
> global PHP variables and functions, with some limited additional
> convenience functionality."
>
> ... I was thinking "request" would be reasonable. Anybody care one way or
> another?
>
> Also, critique of the class/property/method names (etc.) is welcome.
>
> Thanks all!
>
>
> --
>
> Paul M. Jones
> http://paul-m-jones.com
>
>
>
>
> --
> PECL development discussion Mailing List (http://pecl.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>