Re: New Package Name: "request" ?

Hi Paul, On 25/10/2016 22:59, Paul Jones wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Now that my account has been approved (thanks again Alan!) I'd like to register the > package that John Boehr and I have been working on. Per <9 > IZ��H��Ok�@�Nhttp://pecl.php.net/package-new.php>: > >> Make sure you pick the right name for your package. This is usually done through >> "community consensus", which means posting a suggestion to the pecl-dev mailing list and >> have people agree with you. > > So, given the following work in progress ... > > <https://gitlab.com/pmjones/phprequest/> "This > extension provides fundamental server-side request and response objects for PHP. These are not HTTP > message objects proper. They are more like wrappers for existing global PHP variables and functions, > with some limited additional convenience functionality." > > ... I was thinking "request" would be reasonable. Anybody care one way or another? > > Also, critique of the class/property/method names (etc.) is welcome. My guess is that "request" could be a bit too generic, especially given there's a response class too. It also makes it sound like it was something official. However, I have no better suggestions atm. Cheers -- Matteo Beccati Development & Consulting - http://www.beccati.com/