Re: filesystem notification extension

From: Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2024 16:29:36 +0000
Subject: Re: filesystem notification extension
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  Groups: php.pecl.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pecl-dev+get-17606@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On 05.08.2024 at 17:21, Frederik Bosch wrote: > On 04-08-2024 20:27, Christoph M. Becker wrote: > >> I'm generally fine having PECL extensions written in Rust, *if* these >> extension clearly signal that requirement.  A prominent note in the >> documentation would certainly a good first step.  Not sure what else >> could be done; upgrading the PECL package.xml format might be an option >> (does it even signal whether an extension requires an C++ compiler?) > > Thank you for your work so far. I think signaling, for me, is no > problem. A specific tag or attribute in the package.xml would be a good > way forward, maybe a new tag <cargo> under <dependencies>. But in the > meantime the description tag and the documentation page can address it too. That appears to be a sensible compromise for now. If nobody objects, I think we should proceed in a couple of days. Do you already have a PECL account, Frederik? (sorry, I've lost track) Christoph

« previous php.pecl.dev (#17606) next »