Re: filesystem notification extension
| From: | Frederik Bosch | Date: | Wed, 07 Aug 2024 07:41:19 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: filesystem notification extension | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 | Groups: | php.pecl.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pecl-dev+get-17607@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 06-08-2024 18:29, Christoph M. Becker wrote:
On 05.08.2024 at 17:21, Frederik Bosch wrote:That's great. I don't have a PECL account yet. Regards, FrederikOn 04-08-2024 20:27, Christoph M. Becker wrote:That appears to be a sensible compromise for now. If nobody objects, I think we should proceed in a couple of days. Do you already have a PECL account, Frederik? (sorry, I've lost track) Christoph Hi Christoph,I'm generally fine having PECL extensions written in Rust, *if* these extension clearly signal that requirement. A prominent note in the documentation would certainly a good first step. Not sure what else could be done; upgrading the PECL package.xml format might be an option (does it even signal whether an extension requires an C++ compiler?)Thank you for your work so far. I think signaling, for me, is no problem. A specific tag or attribute in the package.xml would be a good way forward, maybe a new tag <cargo> under <dependencies>. But in the meantime the description tag and the documentation page can address it too.