Re: results of work

> I was somewhat surprised at the number of invalid package.xml files in > there. I added a ton of validation to package.xml 1.0 stuff - there are > some serious problems that have been present in every PEAR version, like > allowing PHP dependencies that just don't work, and so on. > Do you have a specific list of which package.xml files are invalid? > So, after all of this, I can honestly say that pear convert/pear package > combination works on every single pecl package that has a valid > package.xml 1.0. This is a good first step. Here is a release process > flow I would like to run by you: > This assumes that a given package has any need for package2.xml's features... > Comments? > I'll grab 1.4.1 when it's out and run some tests, but as for using package2.xml in practice I'm actually starting to remove these files from my packages since they're no longer required by pecl.php.net and maintaining two package files (which contain the same information) is an unnecessary piece of work in my case. -Sara