Re: Re: results of work
| From: | Dan Scott | Date: | Fri, 23 Sep 2005 18:30:16 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: results of work | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pecl.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pecl-dev+get-2969@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 9/23/05, Sara Golemon <pollita@php.net> wrote:
> > I was somewhat surprised at the number of invalid package.xml files in
> > there. I added a ton of validation to package.xml 1.0 stuff - there are
> > some serious problems that have been present in every PEAR version, like
> > allowing PHP dependencies that just don't work, and so on.
> >
> Do you have a specific list of which package.xml files are invalid?
>
xmllint says imagick and cyrus are the guilty parties (lacking basic
well-formedness, anyways; if there's a DTD for package.xml it would
make a validity-testing script a little easier to run).
Dan