Re: separating pecl
| From: | Antony Dovgal | Date: | Tue, 30 Mar 2004 08:03:02 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: separating pecl | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.pecl.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pecl-dev+get-495@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004 09:41:39 +0200 (CEST)
Derick Rethans <derick@php.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Mar 2004, Antony Dovgal wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 27 Mar 2004 10:03:17 +0100
> > Lukas Smith <smith@backendmedia.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I am not sure how to best proceed with the pecl package docs. I have
> > > heard before that they will eventually end up in the main php
> > > documentation(?)
> >
> > I haven't heard this before, but I'm already -1 for that if my voice
> > counts. Main PHP documentation is big enough ATM and making it even
> > bigger can cause some problems IMHO.
>
> It was a policy set in the Doc meeting from last year's LinuxTag; the
> idea is to provide filters over the total documentation so that it might
> show "core", "internals", "pecl" etc.
So, maybe peardoc should be integrated there too ?
> > Agree.
> > I suppose the best solution would be:
> > 1) to create pecldoc (it could be combined with phpdoc in the future as Zend API docs now)
>
> No! Not more maintenance please!
As you wish =)
---
WBR,
Antony Dovgal aka tony2001
tony2001@phpclub.net || antony@dovgal.com