Re: Proposal for new extension: binding to libSVM

From:	Vijay Aswadhati	Date:	Mon, 16 Jun 2008 18:34:35 +0000
Subject:	Re: Proposal for new extension: binding to libSVM
References:	1 2 3	Groups:	php.pecl.dev
Request:	Send a blank email to pecl-dev+get-5547@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message

Pierre Joye wrote:

On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Antony Dovgal <tony@daylessday.org> wrote:
On 14.06.2008 20:08, Vijay Aswadhati wrote:
    I am planning to name the extension php_svm and check in the project in
pecl as "svm".
      
So it will be PECL/svm, not PECL/php_svm, right? Why name it php_svm then?
    

please not php_svm, "svm" is enough :) That is correct; as checked in under pecl, the directory name would "svm"; the compiled extension (binary) would be named "php_svm.[dll|so]" as appropriate for the platform. I thought that was the convention, let me know if I have missed something. -- Vijay