Re: want to discuss - mvc extension

On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:13 PM, Nathan Nobbe<quickshiftin@gmail.com> wrote: > hi everyone, > a couple of months back, i posted about my work on a native port of pureMVC. > > http://marc.info/?l=pecl-dev&m=124279565212236&w=2 > > nobody said anything, which i took to mean nobody on this list values the > idea of having native mvc classes in a php extension.. > > first off, please correct me if i'm wrong.  secondly, i would like to know, > if you think this extension is useless, then please tell me why.  i think > ive earned that much by spending the time to make it work, and thoroughly > testing it. > > as well i should mention the extension adds additional classes, besides > Model, View, and Controller, such as a set of observer classes, which unlike > the spl, allow passing of data with the notification call, which some people > definitely prefer over the pull paradigm spl exposes.  think of javascript > for example.. > > ive seen a number of extension proposals prior to and since mine, get > accepted essentially, immediately.  i think they're all getting accepted, > because they all are just php wrappers for C libraries.  but as you well > know, there are tons of possibilities for extensions beyond the realm of C > library wrappers.., and i think an mvc is one of them.  i also think its > only fair that my extension be considered, if not accepted since it is the > first such (mvc) extension proposed; and ive chosen a standardized (pureMVC) > library for the implementation. > > i hate to whine, but i put a lot of time into this so far and i really want > to keep going.  though not getting the endorsement as an accepted pecl > extension will really limit any acceptance level of the project, if i were > to speculate..  i tried to ask what other options i have as far as > leveraging the pecl client w/o having my code on pecl.php.net, but nobody > wanted to throw me a bone..; either way though, id rather have the code on > pecl.php.net than some other box, which people would have to pecl > channel-add for some other domain. > > thanks for listening, and again, im looking forward to your response, I don't see any reason not to have this extension in pecl :-) you can use "puremvc" as the name. I take it for granted, that you are using "PHP License" for the code. Would be great, if you could post full snapshot of sources for review. Do you have svn account? pecl account? If not, you should apply for those -- Alexey Zakhlestin http://www.milkfarmsoft.com/ Sent from St Petersburg, Russian Federation