Re: want to discuss - mvc extension

On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Kalle Sommer Nielsen <kalle@php.net> wrote: > Hi Nathan > > 2009/8/10 Nathan Nobbe <quickshiftin@gmail.com>: > > On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Alexey Zakhlestin <indeyets@gmail.com > >wrote: > > > > ive uploaded the source to github, since thats what im using to version > the > > code myself. and before a flame war starts, im more than happy to drop > the > > code into svn to host here :D > > > > http://github.com/quickshiftin/PureMVC-ext/tree/master > > Is this extension 5.3 compatible? Because I get many compilation > errors when trying to build under 5.3.1-dev from SVN: > http://pastie.org/579173 > > Ps. Remember to update config.w32 so you can enable the extension :) the first email (from the original proposal) you can see where im at w/ the extension and the future roadmap; here is the list again: goals for a promotion to beta would roughly include, . address current list of todos (small) . build & test on windows platforms . build on additional arch / os . create an additional branch for 5.3 and add namespaces to the classes in that branch . generate/write documentation followinghttp://wiki.php.net/doc/scratchpad/pecldocs . pureMVC multi-core support (pending further research) nothing much has changed here since my original proposal :( what i was working on for a little bit was a thin application framework around pureMVC, w/ a class loader that supports modular class naming conventions such as the one used by zend framework for php 5.2, and one that caters more to a 5.3 naming convention since namespaces are available. im glad to touch it up though to get it inducted into pecl. ill get it to build under 5.3 and also, install windows in some sort of vm so that i can test compilation there. my original hope was to do this post induction to pecl (5.3 having not yet been release at the time of the original proposal), but it does seem that it should be a pre-requisite now that 5.3 has reached prime time. -nathan