Re: New package name
| From: | yoram bar haim | Date: | Sun, 04 Jul 2010 11:21:26 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: New package name | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.pecl.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pecl-dev+get-7321@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
ApacheAccessor is OK.
On Sunday 04 July 2010 13:24:56 Pierre Joye wrote:
> hi,
>
> Sounds good to me, even if I would prefer ApacheAccessor but there is
> no CS forcing the name of the package.
>
> > the one left question is a name. I currently name it Apache Accessor,
>
> Where? Both svn and pecl.php.net names have to match.
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 10:19 AM, yoram bar haim <yoram.b@zend.com> wrote:
> > Can I conclude that nobody has a problem with the name ?
> >
> > On Wednesday 30 June 2010 16:32:29 yoram bar haim wrote:
> >> Hello All.
> >> thanks to the help of Pierre, I'm very close to realesing a new pecl
> >> extension, that exports Apache runtime configuration as PHP array:
> >>
> >> http://svn.php.net/repository/pecl/apache_accessor/trunk
> >>
> >> the one left question is a name. I currently name it Apache Accessor,
> >> are you OK with this name or do you have any other suggestions ?
> >
> > --
> > PECL development discussion Mailing List (http://pecl.php.net/)
> > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php