Re: New package name

hi, Simply keep the current name, easier. But what did you mean by: " I currently name it Apache Accessor," Where did you name it? On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 1:21 PM, yoram bar haim <yoram.b@zend.com> wrote: > ApacheAccessor is OK. > > > On Sunday 04 July 2010 13:24:56 Pierre Joye wrote: >> hi, >> >> Sounds good to me, even if I would prefer ApacheAccessor but there is >> no CS forcing the name of the package. >> >> > the one left question is a name. I currently name it Apache Accessor, >> >> Where? Both svn and pecl.php.net names have to match. >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 10:19 AM, yoram bar haim <yoram.b@zend.com> wrote: >> > Can I conclude that nobody has a problem with the name ? >> > >> > On Wednesday 30 June 2010 16:32:29 yoram bar haim wrote: >> >> Hello All. >> >> thanks to the help of Pierre, I'm very close to realesing a new pecl >> >> extension, that exports Apache runtime configuration as PHP array: >> >> 5²î >> >> Þæ¸nÚÕ¨/‹Vëhttp://svn.php.net/repository/pecl/apache_accessor/trunk >> >> >> >> the one left question is a name. I currently name it Apache Accessor, >> >> are you OK with this name or do you have any other suggestions ? >> > >> > -- >> > PECL development discussion Mailing List (http://pecl.php.net/) >> > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org