Re: Documentation for an extension
| From: | (Uwe Steinmann) | Date: | Fri, 02 Jul 2004 14:05:40 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Documentation for an extension | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.pecl.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pecl-dev+get-932@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 08:58:51AM -0700, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Jul 2004, Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote:
> > IMVHO this is they way it should be for all PECL
> > extensions in the long run as maintaining source
> > and docs in two different repository with a 1:n
> > relationship between docs and source just doesn't
> > make sense at all
> > (having to check out *all* phpdoc while you only
> > use one PECL extension ...)
>
> Yup, I would like to see all PECL extensions have phpdoc-style
> documentation that is accessible directly from the normal php.net/manual
> including all the shortcuts. This is where people go to look for
> documentation and they shouldn't need to worry about whether they
> installed something from pecl or not.
Does that mean that I can/should move over my documentation for
two extensions which are currently in peardoc to php-doc?
Uwe
--
MMK GmbH, Universitaetsstr. 11, 58097 Hagen
Uwe.Steinmann@mmk-hagen.de
Tel: +2331 840446 Fax: +2331 843920