RE: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.4pl1 RC2 rolled

> -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Lynch [mailto:richard@zend.com] > Sent: 10 January 2001 20:51 > To: Zeev Suraski; Cynic > Cc: php-qa@lists.php.net; php-dev@lists.php.net > Subject: Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.4pl1 RC2 rolled > > > > environment, and win32 mod_php4 happens to be rock solid (when > > Is PHP ISAPI rock-solid now?... > > That's not the general impression I've received: If it depends on which > other modules/technoligies you use, that needs to be documented pretty > heavily before one could really call it rock-solid. And that's the way I > understand it to be at this time. > > While I think PHP ISAPI is important, perhaps even critical, I > don't want a > billion Windows users to download it because we said it was solid and find > out differently for the technology they need to use it with. > They'll never > come back. I wouldnt say rock solid but Ive done a few million requests to it with fairly complex scripts (mainly benchmarking) and on a well set up Win 2k system with IIS 5 PHP ISAPI module is very stable, I think that Zeev finds this too. I do not know if I would like to see it in production enviroment yet but under Win 2k IIS5 it seems Good. Under NT 4 AFAIK it is terrible for some unknown reasons. If we can get the few win issues sorted then I think maybe then it will be up to product standards under win2k and IIS 5. (I can never seem to reproduce IIS ISAPI bugs which annoys me :() Just my £0.02 James -- James Moore PHP Quality Assurance Team jmoore@php.net