Re: Function renaming. First attempt at defining some rules.
| From: | Derick Rethans | Date: | Wed, 14 Feb 2001 17:00:34 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Function renaming. First attempt at defining some rules. | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.qa |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-qa+get-2398@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, Phil Driscoll wrote:
> Tony points out that the only way to convince anyone of the sanity of all
> this is to generate the list of functions as they should be, but since there
> are about 1600 functions in 84 extensions, if you managed one function every
> 20 seconds, then it would take you 9 hours to complete! And of course it
> would then be shot down in flames :)
A way to do this is to ask every maintainer of an extention to make a list
of the extension he supports. That way it would cost much less than 9
hours for a person. I'd be happy to do this for the mcrypt extension,
which needs bug fixing anyhow :)
Derick Rethans
---------------------------------------------------------------------
PHP: Scripting the Web - www.php.net - derick@php.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------