Re: Re: [Gallery-devel] [Fwd: PHP 5.2.2RC1 testing]

That sounds good. On 14-Apr-07, at 2:39 PM, Hannes Magnusson wrote:

On 4/14/07, Ilia Alshanetsky <ilia@prohost.org> wrote:

I am not saying we should not aim for 100% code coverage. But, code coverage is only 1/2 the battle, we need to make sure we are not corrupting and leaking memory in the course of the execution, which is information only valgrind can provide to us reliably. That's why we need it enabled for our test suit as we currently do on gcov, I don't want to turn it off just so that we could run more tests.

Arnar is working on a test-farm for us... How about having the gcov box running only php-src tests under valgrind and that farm running all other tests we can get our hands on? -Hannes

On 14-Apr-07, at 11:48 AM, Marcus Boerger wrote:

Hello Ilia, I disagree here. We need to get as close to 100% coverage. But

still

that does not mean we get erverything. Running other tests now gives us the ability to catch much more stuff. And also simply getting 100% coverage does not mean we get all code paths. And also not

necessarily

check for all inputs.... So IMO we should do both. best regards marcus Saturday, April 14, 2007, 4:47:41 PM, you wrote:

Running tests without valgrind is a bad idea IMO, even when the

test

returns expected results the background code could be corrupting memory, consequence of which may not need seen inside the test itself. I'd rather run fewer tests with valgrind, then more

tests but

without the full benefit of comprehensive testing.

On 14-Apr-07, at 9:13 AM, Nuno Lopes wrote:

Although the machine isn't very fast, the upgrade to Etch has provided a *huge* speedup. For example the PHP 5.2 build time was cut in about 15 hours. If we don't run those tests with valgrind the machine should be able to run them ok. Nuno

Can our existing gcov machine handle that many tests? Having to wait a week for results would be somewhat inconvenient...

Perhaps

we need to upgrade this machine if we plan to extend the test suit? On 11-Apr-07, at 6:12 PM, Derick Rethans wrote:

On Thu, 12 Apr 2007, Antony Dovgal wrote:

On 04/12/2007 01:57 AM, Derick Rethans wrote:

On Wed, 11 Apr 2007, Marcus Boerger wrote:

Hello Sebastian, is this an area where you could help nuno and me? Meaning setting up PHPUnit and integrating it in the automatic test runs?

I could offfer plenty of code/tests here.

That would be really great.

We've like 2500 tests for our stuff, but not the machine power to run it all under valgrind :) Some of it wouldn't be able to run

without

some database configuration or servers though. I already experimented with exporting our test results to some database as well, but that's still quite primitive (and unfortunately

not

reachable from outside our network). regards, Derick

-- PHP Quality Assurance Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Ilia Alshanetsky

Best regards, Marcus

Ilia Alshanetsky -- PHP Quality Assurance Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Ilia Alshanetsky