Re: Helping Out.

On Tue, 7 Aug 2001, Cynic wrote: >At 16:11 8/7/2001, Jani Taskinen wrote the following: >-------------------------------------------------------------- > >>I don't think the only 'job' for QA is to test RCs. >>There are plenty of 'Open' bug reports in the bug database >>which should be checked to these statuses: >> >>'Analyzed' - Real bug, reproduced(!). >>'Bogus' - Not a bug. Bullshit. >>'Closed' - Fixed already. >>'Duplicate' - There is already a 'Analyzed' of it. > >I know, but I assumed this Andy is the same Andy who started >squashing bugs a week or two ago, so I didn't mention it. This was also a reminder for all the other QA members.. :) I could spend a lot more time on coding if I there were more active persons going through the evergrowing number of reports. There are still a LOT reports in there which are either bogus or fixed already. Also, marking those you can reproduce and which you think are bugs will help developers to see easier which reports are worth to look at. >>Also, we have an IRC channel on #php.bugs @EFnet which >>we have been using to discuss about some reports and >>sometimes even Zeev is there. ;) > >I wasn't aware of that. Thanks for the info. I thought I had said this before.. :) >>If everybody else in QA team is sleeping, I am not! :) >>I'm trying to spend most of my time coding a new bug >>system though. > >I offered help, you know. :)) Yeah, yeah..I'm still building the basic structure here. After I get something simple and working ready, I will commit it to CVS and then others can join the effort. :) --Jani