Re: Helping Out.
| From: | Andrew Lindeman | Date: | Tue, 07 Aug 2001 14:40:46 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Helping Out. | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.qa |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-qa+get-3405@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
i'm looking forward to this "new system" :-)
On Tue, 07 Aug 2001, Jani Taskinen wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Aug 2001, Andy wrote:
>
> >should I still mark a bug "Duplicate" if there is
> >another "Bogus" bug exactly like it, or should I
> >mark that bug "Bogus" too?
>
> Like we do for fixed bugs: If there are duplicates
> for a bug that gets fixed and closed, then all
> the duplicates must be closed too.
> The current system is so braindead, that this has
> to be done manually. ie. Search in the duplicates
> for the fixed bug's number and close those.
> That's why the duplicate's 'master' is always put
> to the comments.
>
> So yes, bogus is bogus ALWAYS. Not anything else.
>
> --Jani
>
> p.s. The new system will be much more intelligent. :)
>
>
> >On Tue, 07 Aug 2001, Jani Taskinen wrote:
> >> I don't think the only 'job' for QA is to test RCs.
> >> There are plenty of 'Open' bug reports in the bug database
> >> which should be checked to these statuses:
> >>
> >> 'Analyzed' - Real bug, reproduced(!).
> >> 'Bogus' - Not a bug. Bullshit.
> >> 'Closed' - Fixed already.
> >> 'Duplicate' - There is already a 'Analyzed' of it.
> >>
> >> Also, we have an IRC channel on #php.bugs @EFnet which
> >> we have been using to discuss about some reports and
> >> sometimes even Zeev is there. ;)
> >>
> >> If everybody else in QA team is sleeping, I am not! :)
> >> I'm trying to spend most of my time coding a new bug
> >> system though.
> >>
> >> --Jani
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, 7 Aug 2001, Cynic wrote:
> >>
> >> >Hi Andy,
> >> >
> >> >I guess the reason you haven't received any welcome message
> >> >is that everybody expected Zak Greant would do that, and he's
> >> >too busy. Sorry for that.
> >> >
> >> >The QA team seems to be sleeping now -- again, Zak is too
> >> >busy doing other stuff. You'll learn that he is the "driving
> >> >force" of PHP's QA. When there's no discussion about language
> >> >issues, we usually just test Release Candidates when they're
> >> >packaged, and report the test results here. So, until the
> >> >4.0.7 RC 1, there's not much to do right now.
> >> >
> >> >And welcome :)
> >> >
> >> >BTW, what platforms can you "offer", i. e. run the regression
> >> >tests on?
> >> >
> >> >At 15:25 8/7/2001, Andy Woolley wrote the following:
> >> >--------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >>Hi All,
> >> >>
> >> >>I sent a message a few weeks ago stating that I can spare some time to help
> >> >>out in either Linux, Win32 or MacOSX or perhaps all 3 if needed.
> >> >>
> >> >>I'm not too sure what to do next, I've heard nothing since I sent
> >> >>the
> >> >>original message.
> >> >>
> >> >>If you guys have all the help you need, then great I'll just sit and
> >> >>wait,
> >> >>otherwise let me know if there is anything I can do to help.
> >> >>
> >> >>Regards,
> >> >>
> >> >>Andy.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>--
> >> >>PHP Quality Assurance Mailing List
> >> >><http://www.php.net/>
> >> >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-qa-unsubscribe@lists.php.net
> >> >>For additional commands, e-mail: php-qa-help@lists.php.net
> >> >>To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin@lists.php.net
> >> >------end of quote------
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >cynic@mail.cz
> >> >-------------
> >> >And the eyes of them both were opened and they saw that their files
> >> >were world readable and writable, so they chmoded 600 their files.
> >> > - Book of Installation chapt 3 sec 7
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> PHP Quality Assurance Mailing List
> >> <http://www.php.net/>
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-qa-unsubscribe@lists.php.net
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: php-qa-help@lists.php.net
> >> To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin@lists.php.net
> >