Re: Just a tiny thing
| From: | Chris Adams | Date: | Thu, 27 Jul 2000 21:26:56 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Just a tiny thing | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.qa |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-qa+get-348@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> At 02:08 PM 7/27/00 -0700, Chris Adams wrote:
>
> >"Egon Schmid" <eschmid@php.net> wrote in message
> >news:39809D4C.A3C23BC5@php.net...
> > > Oh no, we need all to clean up the user annotations in the manual.
Thats
> > > a huge problem with Open Source Software. Richard Stallman said at the
> > > LinuxDays in Stuttgart: "Microsoft don't have that problem."
> >
> >This would be a very, very good thing. Right now the annotations are
> >basically useless because there's a ton of crap for every useful
annotation.
> >It would seem to me that anything which reports a bug (or behaviour in
dead
> >versions (e.g. beta build)) or asks a question should be deleted *and* an
> >email should be sent to the submitter reminding them that this is not a
bug
> >tracking system and directing them to http://bugs.php.net/
> >if they're
still
> >having problems.
>
> Perhaps members of the QA team who have little to contribute during the
> actual fixing of bugs (like me!) could take a look at this after the work
> on the bug database is mostly complete.
I'd like to be involved with that as well; I'd love to help with PHP
development but I don't have enough time to really be helpful (not to
mention that I'm not exactly the world's largest fan of C). Whereas I do end
up looking things up in the PHP manual and noticing problems or a regular
basis. Maybe we could work with the doc team to give some people editorial
access for comments? I think a quick trip through the php-general archives
and the FAQ/KB listings would turn up some knowledgeable candidates who
could be trusted for this sort of thing.
Chris