Re: [RFC] Facility for QA reports

On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 01:02:31PM -0000, Karl Austin wrote : > >> A given testfile record would be optionally tied to a bug ID. Many > >> testfile records (and their corresponding tests) are a direct result > >> of bug-resolution. > >> > >> The success/failure of a given testfile record would be tied back to > >> the bug ID automatically. > > > That is what is proposed. The 'bugs' textfield contains a > > comma-or-whatever separated list of associated bug reprots. > > Bad idea, if you want to store multiple values for a single field then > split the field off into another table rather than having several files > stored by a deliminator, it's just not good DB design otherwise and it > will come back and bite you in the ass later. I don't know if we can link the real bug DB table together or not. Having a separate table instead of the list seems awkward either to me. Thanks for your Feedback! - Markus -- Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.