Re: [RFC] Facility for QA reports

From: Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 18:46:45 +0000
Subject: Re: [RFC] Facility for QA reports
References: 1 2 3  Groups: php.qa 
Request: Send a blank email to php-qa+get-4202@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Markus Fischer writes: > On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 01:02:31PM -0000, Karl Austin wrote : > > >> A given testfile record would be optionally tied to a bug ID. Many > > >> testfile records (and their corresponding tests) are a direct result > > >> of bug-resolution. > > >> > > >> The success/failure of a given testfile record would be tied back to > > >> the bug ID automatically. > > > > > That is what is proposed. The 'bugs' textfield contains a > > > comma-or-whatever separated list of associated bug reprots. > > > > Bad idea, if you want to store multiple values for a single field then > > split the field off into another table rather than having several files > > stored by a deliminator, it's just not good DB design otherwise and it > > will come back and bite you in the ass later. > > I don't know if we can link the real bug DB table together or > not. Having a separate table instead of the list seems > awkward either to me. > > Thanks for your Feedback! > > - Markus Why not normalize and use a join table? Using the delimited list method is something I've tried in the past and has never been worth it. :) -- Torben Wilson <torben@php.net> http://www.thebuttlesschaps.com http://www.hybrid17.com http://www.inflatableeye.com +1.604.709.0506

« previous php.qa (#4202) next »