Re: Re: Results
| From: | Sander Roobol | Date: | Sun, 24 Mar 2002 12:42:36 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Results | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.qa |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-qa+get-4682@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 2002.03.24 12:40 derick@php.net wrote:
can somebody fix this test instead then? I'll do that...Sander
Derick On 23 Mar 2002, Jim Winstead wrote: Jome <jome@emoj.net> wrote:Test array_walk, arsort, asort, krsort, ksort, rsort and sort(001.p ... failedi believe this test is simply broken. the expected test results are out of sync with the data that is actually tested. it's not a great test to begin with -- there's just too much there to really tell what is going on. i think we'd be better served by distinct tests that were more explicit in testing the edge conditions. jim -- PHP Quality Assurance Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know why this fails.PHP: Scripting the Web - derick@php.net All your branches are belong to me! SRM: Script Running Machine - www.vl-srm.net----------------------------------------------------------------------- -- PHP Quality Assurance Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php