Re: probably uninteresting, xmlrpc build error libiconv related

hmmmm somebody suggested by email to add the --with-iconv configure option (sorry, but it's late and my fingers flies on the delete key a little too fast), I tried both with and without the iconv option, and got the same compilation error, so it's definitely not that, and yes iconv is in /usr/local/lib which is in ld.so.conf and I run ldconfig after installing it. L. "Richard Lynch" <ceo@l-i-e.com> wrote in message news:a0431012eb8c699f9d96f@[192.168.1.103]... > >I checked out the 4.0.2 rc1 source from cvs half an hour ago, this is what's > >giving me the build error =) > > META comment^H^H^H^H^H^H^H kibbitz: > > Ya know... > > It would be Really Nifty (tm) if ./configure and those QA test > messages we're getting had a unique ID number in them that > differentiated CVS as of time tick A as opposed to just "4.2.0 rc1" > which may or may not really be what is on the download page as "4.2.0 > rc1"... > > Any reason why this isn't just automatically spewed out as the first > line of each process (configure and that nifty new QA test report > thingie) and/or before any error messages are actually output in the > build?... > -- > Got Music? http://l-i-e.com/artists.htm