RE: [PHP-QA] Is a new bug reporting system needed?
| From: | Jason | Date: | Mon, 03 Jul 2000 21:04:29 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PHP-QA] Is a new bug reporting system needed? | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.qa |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-qa+get-88@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> > The biggest problem seems to be too many open bugs - as many people have
> > suggested, perhaps we should just focus on getting those cleared up.
>
> Definitely. I think one very simple but effective measure would
> be allowing
> the QA team to confirm bugs (perhaps with commentary). That'd allow the
> developers to fix confirmed problems before looking at what's left.
>
> One other thing that would seem to be useful would be an [internal?] area
> where we could flag certain features as needing examination. For example,
> this afternoon I've been running in to a problem with heredoc output. It
> seems to be related to the line termination used (Unix line termination
> seems to be immune) but it's not quite that simple and I haven't
> had time to
> track it down exactly. It'd be handy if there was a place where QA people
> with spare time could see items which have been flagged as behaving
> suspiciously, see if they can make it break and then submit a
> well prepared
> bug report instead of the "$FEATURE fails weirdly" bug report that'd
> probably be filed otherwise.
I think these are all good ideas but I think for the moment, our time would
be better spent trying to accomplish our main goal. Organizing a structure
for the QA team and establishing procedure for testing the RCs is the
primary reason this team was established. While I think all these issues
need to be addressed, I think we should wait a bit before acting on them.
If we can accomplish our primary goal, we will have made a huge stride in
aiding the developers.
Jason
_______________________________________________________
Site Design, Hosting, and E-Commerce at www.webpipe.net