RE: [SMARTY-DEV] Re: Debug Console
| From: | Monte Ohrt | Date: | Wed, 21 May 2003 21:53:10 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [SMARTY-DEV] Re: Debug Console | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.smarty.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-smarty-dev+get-1479@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
I'm just thinking out loud, currently there is a {popup} function
bundled with Smarty which uses overlib. I don't know if we should
continue that formality or not. If we use {treemenu}, then respectively
we should use {overlib} instead of {popup}. Hindsight 20/20? :-)
Should this be bundled in the default distribution? I kind of like the
idea of bundling useful things, it makes Smarty more attractive when it
makes life easier... especially powerful things like making javascript
menus simple to implement. And of course, no penalties for adding more
power since it's a plugin.
I actually have a plugin that uses a commercial product for creating
dropdown menus called CooljsMenu Pro
(http://javascript.cooldev.com/scripts/coolmenu/). The only thing
stopping me from finishing it and releasing it is that CooljsMenu Pro is
not open source. They also make a product called CooljsTree Pro, which
is very similar to nanotree. I like the idea of sticking to open source.
Monte
On Wed, 2003-05-21 at 16:23, Tom Anderson wrote:
> {nanotree data=$array showRootNode=false sortNodes=false dragable=false}
> was my idea.
>
> function.nanotree will mostly echo out a lot of javascript. A {treemenu}
> type function would need to call another function to process the nanotree.
> Options would likely be different for the various tree menues too. I
> think, until another tree comes around, we should stick w/ {nanotree}. A
> {treemenu} wrapper could be added later...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Monte Ohrt [mailto:monte@ispi.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2003 3:24 PM
> To: Tom Anderson
> Cc: 'Tom Sommer'; 'Smarty Dev'
> Subject: RE: [SMARTY-DEV] Re: Debug Console
>
>
> How should it work? Something like:
>
> {nanotree ...}
>
> Or something more flexible, like:
>
> {treemenu type="nanotree" ...}
>
> where nanotree is the default type?
>
> Monte
>
> On Wed, 2003-05-21 at 16:10, Tom Anderson wrote:
> > I'll do it....shouldn't take long at all.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Monte Ohrt [mailto:monte@ispi.net]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2003 3:13 PM
> > To: Tom Sommer
> > Cc: Smarty Dev
> > Subject: Re: [SMARTY-DEV] Re: Debug Console
> >
> >
> > This would be a very useful plugin, FYI. Anyone up for the task?
> >
> > On Wed, 2003-05-21 at 16:06, Tom Sommer wrote:
> > > On Thu, 15 May 2003 12:23:54 +0200, Luca Borrione wrote:
> > >
> > > > One of these modifications was about the debug console. Now, after
> > > > some
> > > > months since the original idea, I finally found time enough to reach a
>
> > > > stable version of it. It's not finished, but I have no time now to go
> > > > further on it.
> > >
> > > Have a look at http://nanotree.sourceforge.net :)
> > >
> > > --
> > > Tom Sommer, Denmark
> > > www.tsn.dk - www.dreamcoder.dk
> > --
> > Monte Ohrt <monte@ispi.net>
--
Monte Ohrt <monte@ispi.net>