Re: nanotree
| From: | boots | Date: | Wed, 21 May 2003 23:22:29 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: nanotree | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.smarty.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-smarty-dev+get-1481@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
would {HTML_TREE} fit the bill a little better?
I don't like the idea of this type of functionality being driven by
nanotree's design. It makes good sense to use it for the
implementation, but a more general design is likely the way to go for
such a pervasive tool. Besides, it would be a good idea to have a
container type (at least for the data) that could support multiple menu
layouts.
>From nanotree.js: * You have to set a container element, this is the
>element in which the tree will be.
Sounds like you can have multiple container elements.
To follow-up on Monte's point, I disagree with bundling TOO much as
part of the core distro. Perhaps seperate (but supported?) performance
packs? I can see Smarty branching in several directions and I think
bundling 3rd party tools with the main distro might stifle and even
hinder that. On-the-other-hand, having bundled packs of targetted
plugins could both give a kicker to users and also result in more
focused support from insterested groups. Besides, getting in the
business of distributing JS libraries is not fun.
Competition is also hard to gauge. I also thought that this site
http://webfx.eae.net/ had excellent JS, for example.
Also on the point of bundling, it might discourage third parties
(commercial and otherwise) from trying to integrate their tools with
Smarty if they see a competitor packaged right into the distro. I'd
love to encourage developers to use templates instead of hardboiling
HTML in their products.
Speaking of bundling, where is overlib these days? I seem to have lost
track of my copy and it doesn't seem to be included in the distro
anymore. ??
Lastly, I finally took another peek at Pear now that it has "full"
Windows support and I am feeling a lot less brittle towards it. Would
it be a good idea to look there first before looking for other 3rd
party libraries? For example, the pear::var_dump looked promising as a
tool for the debug window support....
ANYHOW, more power to you Tom !!
xo boots
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com