Re: [SMARTY-DEV] Re: object support

... and there's an issue with nested objects. support that? {$foo->bar->blah} {foo->bar->blah} If that is OK, then what about method access, that can only be set on the root object? Monte On Mon, 2003-01-13 at 14:22, Monte Ohrt wrote: > Another idea for object access syntax. > > We already support this syntax to access properties of objects: > > {$foo->bar} > > So why not access methods like this? > > {foo->bar p1="p1" p2="p2"} > > It is better than the {object ...} syntax, and still keeps a distinction > between functions and objects, all without conflicting what "foo.bar" > means. Also, it should be perfectly legal to have a registered function > and registered object of the same name, and this will work. > > This does break a little backward compatability since objects must now > be registered instead of assigned. But is there really a good reason or > advantage of having objects mixed with assigned variables? > > > Monte -- Monte Ohrt <monte@ispi.net>